Match List I with List II and select the answer using the code given below the Lists: List I (Landmark Judgment): A. Golaknath case B. Minerva Mills case C. Indra Sawhney case D. Shreya Singhal case List II (Issue): 1. Examining the validity of Section 66 A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 on the grounds of violating freedom of speech 2. Validity of Mandal Commission Report and the extent of Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India 3. Whether the First, Fourth and Seventh Constitutional Amendments are parts of the Constitution of India by acquiescence 4. Validity of the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act
Show answer
Answer C (official UPSC key)Golaknath → whether the 1st, 4th and 7th Amendments are part of the Constitution by acquiescence | Minerva Mills → validity of the 42nd Amendment | Indra Sawhney → Mandal Report and extent of Art 16(4) | Shreya Singhal → Section 66A IT Act vs free speech